Understanding the Process Behind College Football Playoff Rankings

For those who follow college football closely, the College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings can be a maze of complex algorithms, subjective judgments, and strategic considerations. However, the process behind determining these rankings is not as mysterious as it might seem. This article aims to demystify the method and composition of the CFP committee, and how they arrive at their final decision.

Role of the CFP Committee

The CFP rankings are determined by a 13-person committee, comprised predominantly of athletic directors, with a few coaches, former players, and one writer included. This unique blend of perspectives ensures a diverse and multifaceted evaluation of the teams and their performances throughout the season. Each week, the committee convenes to review the previous games, considering a wide range of factors such as wins, losses, and the overall strength of a team’s schedule.

Strength of Schedule and Conference Considerations

A critical factor in the ranking process is the strength of schedule. Teams facing stronger competition are generally given more weight in the rankings. Additionally, the committee takes into account the conference each team is a part of, as power-conference teams often have a distinct advantage. The committee evaluates the historical, current, and potential performance of teams, forming an opinion that is both scientific and possibly influenced by personal biases.

Pre-season and Season-long Assessments

It is important to note that there is not a pre-season polling metric specifically for the CFP rankings, but it does draw influence from the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) metrics, which are still relevant today. The BCS system, now known as the CFP Committee’s primary method, initiates its rankings well into the season, typically by polling human experts and a computer algorithm. This polling system provides a fair assessment of team performance, relied upon to make determinations for the championship game.

Weekly Evaluations and Adjustments

The process is an ongoing evaluation that takes into account the week’s games, allowing for adjustments as the season progresses. Members of the CFP committee not only watch the games but also consider various win and loss scenarios, discussing and voting on the teams to determine their ranking.

Bias and Impartiality in Decision-making

While subjective judgments are inevitable, the committee strives for objectivity. However, maintaining complete impartiality can be challenging. Personal biases or preferences for certain teams can sometimes seep in, making it difficult to see all teams from an equal perspective. Nonetheless, the committee attempts to promote teams in a fair and unbiased manner, and while this may not always be perfect, it is an ongoing effort to improve the system.

Conclusion

The College Football Playoff rankings are the result of a complex and multifaceted process involving a diverse committee with a wide range of expertise. While the system is not without bias, it is designed to provide a fair and accurate assessment of college football team performance. Understanding the dynamic and the players involved can help appreciate the significance and the effort behind these rankings, which ultimately determine the champions in one of the most competitive and beloved collegiate sports in the United States.