The Plausibility of Communism in Reality: An Analysis of Achievability and Ideals

Communism has long been a subject of debate, with its feasibility and desirability often questioned. While the concept of a classless society where the means of production are owned collectively by the community is attractive, the question remains: is communism achievable in reality, or is it an unattainable ideal? This discussion explores the potential for non-dictatorial communist societies and the challenges associated with achieving such a system.

Examples of Achievable Communism

Despite common perceptions, there are instances where communism has been achieved and practiced in a non-dictatorial manner. Here are a few examples that illustrate the feasibility of such a system:

The Bushmen and Monastic Communities

Communism is not an abstract idea confined to historical contexts. Case studies from societies like the Bushmen in Southern Africa demonstrate the practicality of shared communal living without the concept of private property. In many monasteries, monks engage in voluntary work, sharing tasks and resources, which mirrors communist principles without hierarchical dictatorial structures.

Peasants of the Middle Ages and Amish Communities

Intermittent echoes of communism can be found in historical settings, such as the medieval peasant communities, which practiced collective farming and shared resources, often beyond traditional monetary transactions. Similarly, Amish and Mennonite communities exhibit a form of socialist living, without a monetary system, and with a strong focus on communal wellbeing.

The Challenges to Achieving Communism

While communism can be achieved in certain contexts, large-scale implementation faces significant challenges. The expansion of capitalism often moves away from class consciousness and towards a destructive path that undermines the emergence of communist ideals. As capitalism consolidates and consumerism becomes more prevalent, the incentives for meritocracy diminish, making it difficult to sustain a communist framework.

Complexity and Meritocracy

The practicality of communism also hinges on the complexity and unpredictability of societal systems. Meritocracy, essential for communist societies, relies on predictable forms of competition and hierarchy. However, the increasing specialization and unpredictability of modern society challenge these foundational principles. Factors such as technological advancements and unforeseen changes create an environment where meritocratic competition becomes obscured.

Western Approaches to Socialism

Western societies have experimented with various economic models, such as socialism and welfare states, but have found them wanting. The failure of pure socialist models has led to the adoption of welfare states with elements of capitalism. The United States, often perceived as a capitalist utopia, in fact operates as a welfare state, with programs like Social Security and Medicare. Nevertheless, socio-economic disparities persist, with millions living in poverty or homelessness, largely due to the lack of low-skilled job opportunities and the overspecialization of modern economies.

Critique of the Communist Ideal

While communism may appear ideal on paper, it is often argued that such a system neglects essential elements of societal advancement. The promise of "to each according to their needs" overlooks the importance of meritocracy and the adaptability of complex societies. Without a concrete framework for meritocracy, communist societies risk becoming stagnant and unresponsive to changing environmental and technological conditions.

Conclusion

The feasibility of communism in reality is a matter of ongoing debate. While there are examples of non-dictatorial communist societies, the challenges posed by complexity, unpredictability, and the shifting dynamics of economic systems make large-scale implementation difficult. Ultimately, a balanced approach that combines elements of meritocracy, ethical governance, and community welfare may offer a more sustainable alternative to the pure ideal of communism.