The Ethical Dilemma of Steroids in Professional Baseball

The debate over the use of performance-enhancing drugs, particularly anabolic steroids, in Major League Baseball (MLB) has been ongoing for decades. As the question of whether such substances should be allowed in baseball continues to divide opinions, it is essential to consider the ethical implications and broader impact on the sport.

Impact on Competitive Fairness

The primary concern with the legalization of steroids in MLB is the significant threat they pose to competitive fairness. As mentioned, if steroids were allowed, they would likely become mandatory at every level of baseball to stay competitive. This would fundamentally alter the nature of the game, creating a scenario where athletes are required to harm themselves in a pharmaceutical way to maintain their performance. Such a shift would undermine the very essence of baseball, which depends on skill, strategy, and fair play.

Level Playing Field

At the professional level, the integrity of the game depends crucially on a level playing field. Synthetic drugs like anabolic steroids and Human Growth Hormone (HGH) provide an unfair advantage, allowing some players to skew the dynamics of the sport. This disparity would likely lead to a situation where teams and players with access to such substances would dominate, while others would struggle to compete. Achieving a balanced and fair playing field is essential to ensuring that every team and player has an honest shot at success.

Health and Safety Concerns

Another major challenge associated with steroid use is the potential long-term health and safety risks. In the elite ranks of professional baseball, players have limited life expectancy due to the physical demands of the game. In fact, one tragic example has cited a nephew who passed away at the age of 45 while coaching. This underscores the serious health implications that can arise from steroid use, even among amateur players. The consequences of such substances are not just on the field but can also affect the well-being and longevity of the individuals involved.

Personal Autonomy vs. Collective Integrity

On the other hand, it is argued that athletes should have the freedom to make their own choices regarding their bodies. While it is true that individuals should have autonomy over their own bodies, this perspective needs to be weighed against the collective integrity of the sport. The culture of drug usage is prevalent, from pharmaceutical drugs to illicit substances, and regulating such usage might be seen as a futile effort. However, endorsing these practices would send a dangerous signal to athletes, encouraging a culture of health-risking behaviors.

Conclusion

The use of anabolic steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs in MLB represents a complex ethical dilemma. While some argue that allowing these substances would enhance player performance and satisfy fan interests, the overwhelming consensus is that such substances undermine the fundamental values of fair competition and a level playing field. Furthermore, the health risks associated with steroid use cannot be ignored. As the debate continues, it is crucial for all stakeholders in baseball to consider the broader implications of their positions and work towards a sustainable and ethical approach to the sport.