Should Kickoffs Be Banned in College Football?: A Reassessment of Safety and Gameplay

The recent discussion surrounding the ban of kickoffs in college football is driven by a primary concern: the high-risk collisions between opposing players. Despite the potential benefits of eliminating kickoffs, proponents argue that a few strategic rule adjustments can maintain the excitement and importance of this traditional play without compromising player safety. This article explores the feasibility of retaining kickoffs in college football by introducing rule modifications inspired by Rugby Union and other strategic changes.

Legality of Kicking Out of Bounds

One of the longstanding rules in American football, and particularly in college football, is that it is illegal to kick the ball out of bounds on the field when the ball is in play. This rule is rooted in the concept of keeping the ball in the game rather than allowing it to be out of play. However, this can be modified to address the current concerns. A proposed change to the rule would penalize only kicks that go out of bounds before touching the ground or a player or an official, aligning with existing practices in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).

Reducing High-Speed Collisions: Guarding Sidelines

By modifying the rule to penalize only those kicks going out of bounds before touching the ground, the receiving team would have a significant advantage in protecting the ball. The receiving team would be encouraged to have players guard the sidelines, thereby spreading out and reducing the concentration of players in the center of the field. This would naturally lower the number and severity of high-speed collisions.

Targeting Coffin Corner Kicks and Onside Kicks

Additionally, kicking teams would be motivated to target "coffin corner" kicks to improve field position, while still having the option to attempt onside or kick through the center. These strategic changes would not only maintain the excitement and tension of the game but also encourage more dynamic and skillful play, emphasizing the art of kicking rather than simply kicking long distances.

Better Bargain for the Receiving Team

To further address safety concerns, another proposal is to change the touchback rule for free kicks. The receiving team could start from the 40-yard line, or even the 50-yard line, or from the center of their restraining line, as opposed to the current 45-yard line. This would discourage kicking teams from going too deep, while also discouraging receiving teams from running the ball back from too deep. This balanced approach would ensure that both teams have a fair and safe playing field.

Historical Perspective and Practical Impact

It is worth noting that in recent history, the NCAA abolished a receiving team formation rule that was in place for decades, requiring five players to be within 10 yards of the restraining line. This rule was introduced to reduce high-speed collisions but did not have a significant impact. At the professional level, college teams typically had one fewer player in the blocking formation compared to the pros, which might be why the rule did not make as much of a difference.

Considering these factors, the proposed changes to kicking rules and the touchback rule would not only address the primary concern of high-speed collisions but also enhance the strategic and tactical aspects of the game. These modifications would be easier for officials to enforce and would contribute to a safer and more enjoyable college football experience for all players and spectators.

By maintaining the kickoffs while implementing these carefully considered rule adjustments, college football can continue to be an exciting and well-loved sport, ensuring the safety and enjoyment of players and fans alike.