Safety Comparison: Historical Fencing vs. Kendo

Historical fencing and Kendo are both martial arts disciplines that involve combat technique and the use of weapons. However, they differ significantly in terms of safety, particularly when it comes to the risk of bone-breaking injuries. In this article, we will explore the factors that contribute to the safety or lack thereof in both practices.

Historical Fencing

Technique

Historical fencing involves the use of a variety of weapons such as swords, daggers, and other bladed instruments. Techniques that are employed in these practices can range from thrusting and cutting to more complex maneuvers. If performed improperly or without sufficient safety measures, these techniques can lead to injuries.

Contact Level

Historical fencing often involves full-contact sparring sessions, which can increase the risk of injury. Proper protective gear and adherence to safety protocols are essential to minimize the risk of harm.

Protective Gear

Participants in historical fencing typically wear protective armor, but the level of protection can vary widely depending on the school and the instructor. Some schools prioritize traditional and less protective gear, which may not provide adequate protection against bone-breaking injuries.

Kendo

Technique

Kendo focuses on strikes using a bamboo sword, called a shinai. The techniques and rules in Kendo are more structured and rigid, which helps to reduce the risk of severe injuries. Although Kendo involves strikes and combat, the use of a shinai significantly reduces the likelihood of bone-breaking injuries.

Contact Level

Kendo is generally less likely to result in bone-breaking injuries due to the use of a protective shinai. Additionally, Kendo has a more structured set of rules and regulations, making it a safer practice overall.

Protective Gear

Practitioners of Kendo wear extensive protective gear, referred to as bōgu, which includes a helmet, gloves, and body armor. This comprehensive protective gear greatly reduces the risk of severe injuries, including bone fractures.

Conclusion

In general, Kendo is likely to be safer in terms of bone-breaking injuries due to the use of protective gear and the structured approach to combat. Historical fencing can carry a higher risk of injury, particularly in less regulated sparring situations. However, the actual risk varies depending on the specific practices of the individuals and schools involved. A well-run historical fencing school with trained instructors and proper protective measures can minimize the risk of injury.

It is important to note that while Kendo is a highly organized international sport with standardized equipment, curriculum, and teaching methods, historical fencing is a diverse and less standardized field. The safety of a historical fencing practice can depend significantly on the reputation of the school and the training received by the instructors.

Safe Practice

Whether you choose to practice Kendo or historical fencing, it is crucial to prioritize safety. In Kendo, the use of protective gear and adherence to strict rules ensures a safer environment. In historical fencing, schools with long-standing traditions and well-trained instructors can provide a safer practice.

In conclusion, if your primary concern is minimizing the risk of bone-breaking injuries, Kendo may be the safer choice. However, a well-regulated historical fencing school can also provide a safe and enriching experience.