Is Jasprit Bumrah Better Than Mitchell Starc in This Edition of ICC Cricket World Cup 2019?
Is Jasprit Bumrah Better Than Mitchell Starc in This Edition of ICC Cricket World Cup 2019?
Both Mitchell Starc and Jasprit Bumrah are renowned fast bowlers, each bringing unique strengths and challenges to the table. However, when it comes to evaluating their performance during the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019, Bumrah emerges as the more consistent choice due to his ability to perform across various conditions and against top teams.
Consistency is Key
Bumrah is considered a complete bowler because of his consistency. He maintains a high level of performance regardless of the conditions or the opposition. In contrast, Starc, while effective, relies more on his rhythm and form. When in rhythm, Starc can be devastating, but when not, he may yield more runs. Bumrah, on the other hand, has shown that he can bowl effectively in any situation.
Performances in Different Formats
The debate between these two bowlers may vary based on the format of the game. Let's break down their performances in One Day Internationals (ODIs), Twenty20s (T20s), and Tests.
One Day Internationals (ODIs)
Starc holds an edge in ODIs due to his ability to take wickets more frequently, with an average of 22.49. Bumrah, however, has an average of 24.43. This difference might not fully capture their performances, especially against top teams.
Against Top Teams:
New Zealand: Starc (17.52) vs Bumrah (36.85) England: Starc (34.10) vs Bumrah (45.33) Pakistan: Starc (18.04) vs Bumrah (48.75) South Africa: Starc (33.95) vs Bumrah (19.17)Bumrah has shown significant improvement against lower-ranked teams like Sri Lanka (16.91), Bangladesh (17.00), Zimbabwe (8.56), and West Indies (10.00). However, his overall consistency is still commendable, as evidenced by his performance against these teams.
Twenty20 Internationals (T20s)
Both Starc and Bumrah have similar averages in T20s, with Starc at 19.47 and Bumrah at 20.25. Breaking it down further:
Against South Africa: Starc (25.67) vs Bumrah (71.00) West Indies: Starc (19.50) vs Bumrah (20.25) Pakistan: Starc (13.54) vs Bumrah (20.00) England: Starc (26.60) vs Bumrah (12.00)Notably, Starc has not played any T20 against New Zealand. In T20s, Bumrah has performed exceptionally well against West Indies, showcasing his superior skills in short-form cricket.
Tests
In Test cricket, Starc has an average of 26.98, while Bumrah's average is 20.34. Bumrah shows particular strength against England, South Africa, and West Indies:
England: Starc (28.18) vs Bumrah (25.93) South Africa: Starc (30.71) vs Bumrah (25.21) New Zealand: Starc (24.06) vs Bumrah (31.67) West Indies: Starc (17.92) vs Bumrah (9.23)Bumrah significantly outperforms against Australia in Tests, with an average of 17.00, compared to Starc's 36.19 against India.
Conclusion:
While Starc excels in T20s due to his exceptional performance against West Indies, Bumrah's consistent performance and dominance against top teams in other formats make him a more formidable opponent in ODI and Test cricket. His adaptability to different conditions and his overall performance justify his standing as the more effective bowler in this edition of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019.
-
Comparison of Jordan 1 Highs vs. Mids: Which is Better?
Comparison of Jordan 1 Highs vs. Mids: Which is Better? The debate over whether
-
Reflections on CBS Mornings Trailblazing Broadcast from CPKC Stadium During the National Womens Soccer League Championship
Reflections on CBS Mornings Trailblasting Broadcast from CPKC Stadium During the