Exploring the Limitations of Religious Answers to Existential Questions

The questions surrounding evil, suffering, and death are some of the most profound and perennial concerns of human existence. Religions, with their vast arrays of sacred texts and profound doctrines, attempt to address these questions. However, this article delves into the limitations and inconsistencies that these answers often exhibit, emphasizing the importance of aligning with the wisdom of true prophets and the broader historical context.

Disagreements within Religions

One of the most glaring shortcomings of religious answers to existential questions is the stark divide between the views of ordinary characters and those of true prophets. Ordinary characters within scriptures often reflect perspectives that align with temporal and societal norms, whereas true prophets speak from a divine and more holistic standpoint. This fundamental opposition can lead to a multitude of disagreements and conflicts within and between religious sects.

For instance, ordinary characters might see God as a figure who endorses the killing of animals and humans, as evidenced by verses such as Genesis 9:3 and Numbers 31:17-18. In contrast, true prophets view God as a judge who punishes those who commit such acts, as seen in Isaiah 66:3-4 and Exodus 21:22-23. This inconsistency results in varying beliefs and practices, creating factions and sects within religions.

External Proofs: The Wisdom of Words

The limitations of religious answers also become evident when we consider external proofs, or the hidden wisdom contained within language and historical records. Much like the scriptural narrative of Othello and Genesis, there are subtle clues that can reveal past values and societal norms. For example, the etymology of words can provide insights into historical events and conditions.

Consider the word currency. Its root meaning suggests a medium of exchange that moves swiftly from one person to another, reminding us to avoid hoarding value. Similarly, the use of the word mask during the 2020s implies a global pandemic that brought people together, as noted in:

" mask (2020's) - a pandemic that united all nations and languages"

The word vernacular is derived from verna, meaning "slave," hinting at a time when powerful nations held others in slavery. The term devanagari meaning "gods civilized," reflects a period when humans functioned in a divine manner. Another example is the language Sanskrit, which suggests that conscious use of its words could refine one's being. These language clues shed light on historical cycles and societal transformations.

The Cycle of History and the Need for Rehumanization

According to the article, history is a cycle of remembrance and forgetfulness. In the first half, humanity is characterized by God-consciousness, but in the second half, values are forgotten, and people focus on self-centered lives. This cycle requires a process of rehumanization, similar to daily renewal and rebirth through bathing and sleeping.

In this cycle, the true answer from true prophets is consistent and unifying, just as morning and sleep renew us. The author asserts that to be wise is to act with circumspection, to love light, and to avoid evil. This wisdom is akin to the "fear of God," defined as hatred of evil and a delight in doing God's will.

Conclusion

The author concludes that the limitations of religious answers lie in their alignment with popular opinions rather than divine truth. By embracing the wisdom of true prophets and recognizing the hidden history in language, we can achieve a more comprehensive and unifying understanding of existential questions. These insights guide us toward a renewed sense of purpose and connection to the divine.